recommoning.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the recommoning.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host recommoning.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is New Dream Network LLC .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

search recommoning platforms and the new commons notes on recommoning the new commons about dimeji projects papers & publications contact references select notes on recommoning the new commons about dimeji projects papers & publications contact references wednesday 8 november 2017 0 comments co-designing with ptu using recommoning tools written by dimeji , posted in uncategorized portland tenants united is a local collective comprising of tenants as well as a few landlords agitating for policy changes with housing, as well as attempting to redefine the relationship between landlords and tenants by creating better mechanisms for negotiation. they aim to intervene at different levels of the problem. ptu forces the issue that housing is a fundamental human right, something that we all need to survive, by mobilizing tenants to build a counter-power to the “landlord lobby.” ptu has enjoyed a few recent successes, one of which is an amendment to what is called the relocation ordinance (ordinance 188219), which was passed on february 3, 2017 to provide protections for tenants facing no-cause evictions. the amendment added a clause that mandated relocation assistance when these tenants are involuntarily displaced . while modest, these additions to the law are quickly becoming a legislative template for other laws in washington state as well as other parts of oregon. however, ptu members are well aware that these laws, while they are modest gains, need to be ratified and made permanent. through a series of workshops, they are looking at different ways of converting these temporary laws into permanent cultural shifts. for example, they are investigating ways to reward positively deviant landlords with “tenant-approved” seals that indicate their commitments to tenant rights. when it comes to getting their message across to neighbors and others living in the community in order to build solidarity, ptu members struggle to achieve this objective. they are having problems with engaging willing landlords, homeowners, even a minority of tenants to be advocates for change as well as to understand that tenancy is a fundamental human right. they have tried expanding tactics such as door knocking strategies to overcome this shortcoming. they also flyer neighborhoods as a means of direct action for tenant emergencies that need immediate response. ptu also struggles with issues of minority representations as well as racial disparities with their effort. for example, a lower income african-american tenant will struggle with activism because of the fear of disproportionate blowback or even more dire consequences. as a result, they are more reticent to join a public protest and act in the best interest of the whole. another issue for them is to be able to find other rental housing if they were in fact to be evicted. in this regard, members of ptu are often confronted with their privilege, as they continue to struggle with finding ways to engage other renters much unlike them to participate in working on making tenancy a commons. the workshop exercises with the portland tenants united were conducted at a community center in a local church in portland oregon. a total of 12 participating members attended. the participants were divided into two tables of 6 individuals each. the tables were arranged in a way that allowed individual members to be able to see each other and to talk across the table. the workshop was in three parts (which was presented as three “acts”). recommoning cards were redesigned for the purposes of the workshop. the workshop with portland tenants united took a total of three (3) hours. after collective governance rules were established, workshop participants were asked to select from four dilemmas and negotiate the stalemates. these negotiations were done within open and closed rule systems. during both open and closed rule options, the participants were presented with additional information that was re-introduced into the discussions. outcomes the outcomes for the portland tenants united workshop included: capturing narratives poster or postcard for potential/current tenants to write narratives around housing from personal stories. members wrote “love letters” to the city of portland. “tenant-approved landlord many of the workshop participants were initially reticent to participate engage willing landlords. but through the course of the workshop, as well as the scaffolding process they were able to reverse their judgement on what such participation would look like. participants were able to express the characteristics of a landlord ally, and potential modes of engaging them. however, many participants still remained skeptical about cooperating with landlords, and believed that most landlords were motivated entirely by profit. they explored scenarios, and through the letter writing process to the city of portland, they began to create ideas about what it could mean for the city of portland oregon to have a “tenant-approved landlord.” improving door-knocking strategies – door knocking kit another important outcome from the workshop was the need for a door-knocking kit that will help their door-to-door campaigns. the kit was to be able to provide skeptical landlords with information about being a “tenant-approved” landlords, to work with neighbors in the communities being represented to explain how the might be able to participate, and finally a “door knocking kit” displaying door-knocking strategies as well as the ethics and challenges will be able to allow direct action unionizers to make a case for tenants about the need to participate and build counter-power measures to the “landlord lobby.” value in the hybridity of modalities for “recommoning” one clear outcome was the importance of a hybridity of modalities for recommoning. they include, but are not limited to, the personality of face-to-face discussions as well as the privacy of the autonomy and pseudo-annonymity that online platforms afford in private discussions. these private communication spaces should have a “request – notify – enter” mechanism. a more honest platform a recommoning platform should also be honest – and should share data equitably and within context. platform design an important future implication for recommoning is with the creation of platforms that might be used to reclaim resources. for example, understanding how the different roles and negotiation structure might influence the creation rules around an online platform, how these shifting roles might be built into a system as well as how these differentiated roles may be distinguishable as absorbed roles or assigned roles. tuesday 22 november 2016 0 comments recommoning transitions written by dimeji , posted in uncategorized i was recently invited to give a talk at the by design or by disaster series at the free university of bozen/bolzano. i shared about the overlap between recommoning research and transition design. “with an understanding of a richer commons landscape, we may be able to overlap different types of commons within a system of networks to reveal new patterns of self-governance. recommoning presents us with the opportunity to take “micro acts” of commoning and amplify them to “macro acts” that may shift the way our societies transition to more sustainable futures.” additional details of the talk are here: dimeji onafuwa saturday 23 january 2016 0 comments framing tenancy as a commons written by dimeji , posted in uncategorized frames—the unconscious structures we use to think of problems (lakoff 2012)—are also important to design because they allow us to scale ideas or problems within the context of certain boundaries. frames are always present within overarching systems that help contextualize them. for example, a community situated tenancy problem frame includes different stakeholders such as residents, tenants, landlords, community assets, neighborhood groups, political representatives, residences, and t

URL analysis for recommoning.com

http://www.recommoning.com/2016/01/
http://www.recommoning.com/co-designing-with-ptu-using-recommoning-tools/
http://www.recommoning.com/about-dimeji/
http://www.recommoning.com/co-designing-with-ptu-using-recommoning-tools/#comments
http://www.recommoning.com/category/uncategorized/
http://www.recommoning.com/tenancy-as-a-commons/#comments
http://www.recommoning.com/references/
http://www.recommoning.com/contact/
http://www.recommoning.com/papers-and-presentations/
http://www.recommoning.com/recommoning-transitions/
http://www.recommoning.com/2016/11/
http://www.recommoning.com/author/admin/
http://www.recommoning.com/2017/11/
http://www.recommoning.com/hello-world/#comments
http://www.recommoning.com/mapping-the-space/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: RECOMMONING.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1977030350_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2017-11-08T22:06:44Z
Creation Date: 2015-11-08T13:50:54Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-11-08T13:50:54Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM
Name Server: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-08-25T07:45:18Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =recommoning.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME recommoning.com

  CHANGED 2017-11-08

  CREATED 2015-11-08

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.DREAMHOST.COM 64.90.62.230

  NS2.DREAMHOST.COM 208.97.182.10

  NS3.DREAMHOST.COM 66.33.205.230

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .